Lets explain how escalating/manufacturing a military confrontation with Venezuela gives the administration a legal “hook” to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, one of the oldest national-security laws still on the books. This statute allows a president to detain, restrict, or deport non-citizens from a country the U.S. is at war with or engaged in hostilities against. Under ordinary circumstances, the government cannot legally conduct mass detentions or broad, nationality-based deportations due-process protections, asylum law, and federal courts all create barriers that stop overreach. But by creating even a limited foreign conflict, the administration can claim that a state of hostilities exists, and once that designation is in place, the president can argue that Venezuelan nationals fall under wartime authority. Courts have historically granted wide deference to the executive branch when it claims war powers, which dramatically reduces judicial oversight. The political logic is simple: a foreign conflict is being used as a pretext to unlock a domestic tool that normally would be unconstitutional to deploy at scale.
To make this work, the administration would first escalate tensions military deployments, naval maneuvers in the Caribbean, airstrikes framed as “self-defense,” or any confrontation that can be described as an act of Venezuelan aggression. The president can then issue a proclamation stating that U.S. forces have been “engaged” or that “active hostilities” exist. A formal declaration of war is not required; even historically, the Alien Enemies Act has been triggered by presidential declarations of hostilities rather than votes in Congress. Once invoked, the law gives the executive the power to impose curfews, forced registration, GPS tracking, detention, or deportation of Venezuelan nationals with minimal due process. It essentially bypasses traditional immigration courts entirely. And although the statute would apply to Venezuelans on paper, the broader strategic goal is to create a legal precedent that wartime powers can be blended with immigration enforcement opening the door for future expansions to other nationalities or categories of immigrants simply by linking them to a “security threat.”
This is where the Stephen Miller influence is clearest. For years he has searched for statutory loopholes and obscure executive authorities that avoid judicial review. The Alien Enemies Act is particularly attractive because it is broad, vague, and historically under-challenged; it was written in an era with almost no constitutional protections for immigrants. Manufacturing an external conflict in order to invoke it is a textbook Miller tactic: create a crisis, use the crisis to claim extraordinary authority, and then apply that authority to carry out hardline domestic policy goals. The danger is not just for Venezuelans, it sets a precedent that any administration can engineer a foreign confrontation to justify suspending civil liberties, accelerating mass deportations, or targeting immigrant communities under the guise of “national security.” This all sounding familiar?
Source