Key Points from “Kristi Noem Violates Hatch Act: Airports Fight Back”

Category: Blog

Source:

Original by: Johnny Palmadessa on Substack


Incident Overview

  • Major U.S. airports have declined to broadcast a video featuring Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
  • In the video, Noem blames Democrats in Congress for the current government shutdown.

Hatch Act Concerns

  • The airports’ refusal is based on concerns that airing the video would violate the Hatch Act of 1939.
  • The Hatch Act prohibits most executive branch employees from engaging in partisan political activity or using government resources for that purpose.

Airport Responses

  • Port Authority of New York and New Jersey: Cited longstanding policies against airing partisan political messages at their facilities.
  • Port of Portland (Oregon): Declined to play the video, noting their belief that the Hatch Act prohibits using public assets for political messaging.

Video Content

  • Noem claims in the video that Democrats’ refusal to fund the federal government is affecting operations.
  • She specifically states TSA workers are impacted and working without pay as a result.

Government Shutdown Details

  • The shutdown is due to a standoff between Congressional Democrats and Republicans:
    • Democrats: Want a funding deal to include extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits.
    • Republicans: Oppose that stipulation, causing an impasse.

Article Framing

  • The article’s author frames the issue as a failure for Kristi Noem.
  • Summary quote: “Democrats want to protect your healthcare. Republicans don’t.”

Source Attribution

  • Spokespeople from both the Port Authority and the Port of Portland provided statements emphasizing nonpartisanship and adherence to law.

Summary:
Kristi Noem’s use of an official DHS video to deliver a partisan message was rejected by multiple major airports, who cited both policy and federal law (the Hatch Act). The incident is positioned as part of a broader partisan dispute over government funding and healthcare provisions.

Tags: