Federal Appeals Court Questions Trump Tactics on Alina Habba as U.S. Attorney
Authoritarian Cronyism on Trial: The Habba Appointment Meltdown
The questions came fast and hot: “Is this just patronage, or is there an actual reason she’s here?” (Spoiler: the reason’s as thin as Trump’s skin.)
What followed wasn’t so much a defense as a performance art piece in the Dadaist tradition—nonsense, circular logic, and a breathless insistence that checks and balances are for snowflakes.
The Trump Manual: Loyalty, Not Law, Above All
Habba’s appointment is the latest in a long, ugly lineage of jobs handed out to clutchers of the golden MAGA calf. Judges asked: “Where’s the vetting? Where’s the merit? Why does the DOJ keep sounding like a QVC pitch for autocracy?”
Team Trump’s answer, boiled down: “Because we can. Because the system is broken. And because nobody has stopped us yet.”
How Many Red Flags Does It Take? (Hint: All of Them)
- Rehiring loyalists like Habba is a rollout for one-party rule, not “normal transition.”
- The real message: If you piss off the king, you’re out. If you flatter him, here’s your corner office.
- Defense offered: “Historical precedent? Never heard of her.”
So here’s your normalization check: If even a federal appeals panel is clutching its collective pearls, you know the car is already off the road and headed for the church bake sale.
Democracy Isn’t a Side Plot: Why This Farce Matters
Left-leaning watchdogs and even a few embattled centrists are sounding off: every time a crony is cemented behind the bench, the idea that government serves the people gets tossed out like yesterday’s McNuggets.
Forget “law and order.” This is about “who’s more loyal to the party line?” Spoiler: It’s never going to be you, unless your résumé includes working a Trump-branded casino bankrupting itself in Atlantic City.
Resistance Is Non-Negotiable: No “Both Sides” When Democracy’s on the Table
Stay loud. Stay factual. Make autocrats and their sycophants sweat, because nobody else is going to save this country for you.
Valid, Must-Read Sources:
- Courthouse News: Appeals Court Questions Trump-Era Attorney Appointments
- AP News: Trump’s DOJ and the Fight Over U.S. Attorneys
- NY Times: Alina Habba’s Controversial Federal Appointment
- Politico: Judges Question Trump’s U.S. Attorney Retention
- Just Security: Authoritarian Tactics in Judicial Appointments
- Lawfare: The Catastrophic Impact of a Politicized DOJ
- Democracy Docket: DOJ Appointments & Institutional Damage
- Brennan Center: Why Courts Matter—Checks & Balances
- ProPublica: How Trump Seized the DOJ with Loyalists
- NPR: Authoritarianism and the Judiciary Under MAGA
🔥 Related & Interesting Reads:
- Trump’s Chilling Retribution Campaign Poses a Grave Threat to Democracy
- How the Supreme Court Placed Trump’s ICE Enforcers Above the Law
- Trump Officials Flip Out Over “Trainwreck” Lindsey Halligan
- Trump Nominee Paul Ingrassia Withdraws After Racist Texts Surface
- DOJ Whistleblower Alleges Officials Undermined Rule of Law
- Due Process and the Fourteenth Amendment
- Trump’s Fantasy Cabinet: The New Crony Parade
Subscribe for fact-driven updates and join the resistance. When democracy’s on the line, “civility” is for the history books—being loud and informed is for survivors. This isn’t normal—don’t let it get comfy.
share the article—or at minimum, side-eye every “loyalty” pick you see on the news from now on.
Full story, sources, and follow-ups here.
✊ The fight isn’t over, and neither are we.
