The Trump administration replaced the top lawyer at the IRS in a shake-up that coincided with efforts by officials to access taxpayer data for immigration enforcement. The chief counsel position is one of the highest-ranking roles at the IRS and one of only two that require Senate confirmation.
Under the Trump administration, the IRS has experienced significant leadership turnover, with two commissioners stepping down within weeks. The administration also made a series of requests to the agency, including one that would have granted Elon Musk’s staff access to taxpayer data—a move that would violate federal laws protecting tax records. The IRS has resisted these requests, and here’s why.
Such actions would violate Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which strictly limits access to taxpayer information. Under this law, tax returns and related data are confidential and can only be disclosed to authorized parties under specific circumstances outlined in the statute. Unauthorized access or disclosure of taxpayer data is a felony offense, punishable by fines, imprisonment, and termination of employment for government officials involved.
Violating Section 6103 sets a dangerous precedent by undermining taxpayer privacy, eroding trust in the IRS, and opening the door to political abuse. It risks turning tax records into tools for retaliation, discouraging compliance, and weakening the agency’s independence. If one administration misuses taxpayer data, future administrations may follow, further eroding legal protections and the rule of law.
Additionally, any political interference in the IRS’s enforcement or legal counsel would violate federal ethics and administrative laws, which are designed to ensure the agency operates independently from political pressure. The IRS’s resistance to these requests underscores the importance of maintaining its integrity and protecting taxpayer confidentiality, even amid political upheaval.
Source